Hi Folks,

Years ago, if anyone mentioned Climate Change, I would joke about my burning car tyres in order to raise the temperature in Scotland. So I  might grow grapes up there. It wasn’t the funniest of jokes, but it would get a few ironic laughs. Not these days. These days, Climate Change is a big deal and another of those taboo subjects that you are not allowed to joke about or even question.

Climate Change Protest

This year has seen a step-change in the level of Climate Change debate. Well, not so much debate. More the level of Climate Change protest. Everyone from Politicians, Hollywood ‘A’ lister’s, School kids and of course the rather hysterical Extinction Rebellion mob, have all jumped on the Climate Change bandwagon.

At the risk of being called flippant, it’s hard to get too carried away with the prospect of Climate Change when you are living through a Scottish summer.  Whilst there were one or two scorchers this year, the majority of our summer days were downright chilly.  Climate Change seems a remote prospect when you are sheltering under a gazebo,  huddled around the BBQ for warmth. In mid-August.

Cartoon by Camley sums it up, I think

What is Climate Change?

I should clarify, I am not a Climate Change denier.  There is no arguing the world is getting hotter and weather events are getting more extreme. However, I should probably define what is meant by Climate Change, so we are all on the same page.

Climate Change refers to a large-scale, long-term shift in the planet’s weather patterns and average temperatures. Global warming is a gradual increase in the overall temperature of the atmosphere. Global warming is a contributor to Climate Change. Both of these phenomena can, and have, occurred naturally in the planet’s history.  The issue is the rate of  change we are seeing today. This is attributed to human activities, specifically the levels of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) that are being emitted by human activities. Cars, industry, air travel, home heating, power generation. Lots of things.

NASA Measure levels of CO2 in the atmosphere

Increased atmospheric CO2 levels in 2016

 

Greenhouse Gases

CO2 is a greenhouse gas. When sunlight hits the earth, it’s reflected away. Greenhouse gases trap the sunlight, bouncing it back down to earth, increasing the heating effect.  Hence, the more CO2, the more the temperature rises.  Other greenhouse gases include methane and Chlorofluorocarbons, or CFC’s.

Remember the concern about the holes in the ozone layer?  This was put down to the use of CFC’s. These are a group of volatile organic chemicals used as refrigerants and for fire suppression. CFC’s  are notoriously difficult to contain and often leaked away. Increasing levels of CFC’s in the atmosphere were shown to be gobbling up the ozone, particularly at the poles, hence the ‘holes’. Ozone captures UV radiation which can itself increase temperatures but which is also a cause of skin cancer.  So losing the ozone layer is bad. To combat this, a multilateral agreement, the Montreal Protocol, was introduced in 1987.  This bound world governments to phase out the use of  CFC’s in a phased manner.  The ban has been quite successful and the latest data suggests the ozone layer is recovering. It’s a slow business. CFC’s can last a long time in the environment, but we are seeing increasing levels of ozone and the ‘holes’ are expected to be fully healed by the middle of this century.

Carbon Economy

I am not suggesting, reducing CO2 levels will be as simple or as painless as dealing with CFC’s. The World Economy is essentially based on carbon fossil fuels.  Demand for oil is still increasing and the alternatives are not yet mature enough to be viable.  So whilst it’s great that governments are trying to reduce net CO2 emissions, it is going to take time. It’s not going to happen overnight, no matter how loudly the likes of the Extinction Rebellion mob shout. Demanding a carbon-neutral economy by next year is essentially a call for the end of capitalism. Or to put that another way, it’s quite literally an end to civilisation as we know it. No government is going to sign up to that.

The World Economy is still tied to fossil fuels

Extinction Rebellion

Let’s look at Extinction Rebellion for a moment.  I confess I don’t like them. No matter how noble their cause. No matter how right they might be, I just don’t agree with their tactics. Extinction Rebellion (XR) are a socio-political movement, who see themselves as the moral conscience of Climate Change. They believe in civil disobedience and non-violent resistance.  This manifested itself as a number of demonstrations throughout London and other UK cities earlier this year. Major routes were blocked with static barriers and XR supporters chaining or supergluing themselves to, well anything they could, really.  This resulted in disruption to the lives of ordinary people, gridlocking traffic (which then pumped more and more exhaust fumes into the atmosphere) and generally got everyone very annoyed.

Virtue Signalling

I hate these tactics. It’s virtue signalling of the worse kind and to my mind at least, it damages their cause.  They self define as being good and virtuous, making self-sacrifices for the good of all mankind. By this very stance, they are implying that anyone who doesn’t support them is evil incarnate and hell-bent on selfishly destroying the planet. Then there is the faint whiff of hypocrisy.  When personalities, such as the sainted Emma Thomson,  jet in from LA, to demonstrate their solidarity with the cause when the carbon footprint for such flights is fairly significant, seems counter-intuitive. Wouldn’t a message of support have done? Doesn’t show as well on Instagram, I suppose.

Emma Thompson at ER Protest. “If I could fly cleanly, I would” she said. I have an idea. Don’t fly.

It certainly leaves me with the perception that XR are a bunch of spoiled, well off, hypocrites. People with too much time on their hands, who believe in one set of rules for them and another set for the rest of us.  Its enough to get me back to burning car tyres.  But I won’t.  I guess there are probably a significant number of the XR mob who genuinely walk the walk, knitting porridge from lentils and cycling everywhere.  Good for them.  But to affect the changes they are demanding, they need to change government minds.  I just don’t see their civil disobedience tactics doing that.

Greta Thunberg

The current darling of the Climate Change movement is, of course, young Greta Thunberg.  She worries me. Or to be more precise, I worry about her. Anyone who saw her emotional speech at the recent UN conference cannot help but be impressed by her courage and her passion.  But what I also saw was a vulnerable young girl having a teenage strop. You could almost hear the metaphorical bedroom door being slammed.

Greta Thunberg

Greta is only 16.  She suffers from Asbergers and Anxiety disorders.  If you read an earlier post of mine, you will know that at this age, the brain is still a work in progress and susceptible to the hormones raging around the teenage body. This has the effect of increasing the intensity of everything.  At the same time, teenagers lack the experience and maturity to process these feelings.

Double Edged

As I say, it’s obvious that Greta is passionate in her beliefs and has done an amazing job in raising the profile of Climate Change. But she is a kid. She isn’t an expert, yet she is getting unprecedented levels of exposure at the very highest levels.  I worry she is being cynically exploited by more virtue signalling adults who should know better.  If I were her father, I would be very proud of what she has achieved, but I would also want to protect her.

This exposure and celebrity is a double-edged sword as she is now being exposed to criticism and abuse. Sadly, when you put yourself into the spotlight in this digital age of 24 hr social media, you have to expect this.  A lot of adults struggle with this sort of abuse, so how is a vulnerable 16-year old supposed to cope? I worry she will be badly affected by the trolling she is receiving.   And I blame the people who are thrusting her into the spotlight to further their own cause.  Adults need to sort this mess out. Greta has done her bit, let her go back to being a kid.

Strike 4 Climate

Recently, we have had a series of kids “Strike 4 Climate” demonstrations in support of tackling Climate Change. Kids encouraged to bunk off school and protest. No doubt, Greta has been an inspiration for this.  But again, I can’t agree with it.  Kids need to be in school. By all means teach them about Climate Change. Perhaps one or more of them will come up with an amazing answer to resolve the issue when they grow up.  But the sight of parents encouraging their young children to protest, holding banners with slogans they possibly don’t even understand.  I see this as more virtue signalling by their right on parents who should actually be ensuring their kids are in school.

A day off school for Strike 4 Climate

Kids grow up way too soon as it is these days.  I strongly believe it’s a parents job to protect their children. Let kids be kids and let them enjoy their childhood. Psychologists are reporting an increase in children suffering from anxiety. Nightmares about the end of the world and their impending demise. Goodness knows, they have enough to deal with at the moment without worrying about global extinction.  This has to be down to parents using their offspring to show off their own liberal credentials.   Exposing them to this isn’t virtuous. It’s irresponsible and cruel.

What Next?

I don’t know if we are facing an extinction event or not. I don’t believe we are.  If you live on the coast, it might be a good idea to look for a house further inland and ensure you can swim.  But I have faith we will address climate change before it gets to end of the world status. This won’t be by civil disobedience or by frightening children.  It will be achieved by government policy, influenced by science and facts, not by virtue signalling liberals.  Change is going to take time, but it is coming.  We cannot change a global economic system overnight.  The consequences of trying too could very well prove catastrophic a lot quicker than climate change.

We can all do our bit to help, no matter how insignificant.  However, supergluing yourself to the M2 at Dover isn’t going to make a jot of difference. Apart from irritating a lot of people and showing just how stupid you are.

As you have probably realised, I am no more a Climate Change expert than Greta is.  The above is my personal opinion. I have a small daughter and I want her to grow up and lead a happy, healthy life.  I think she has got a bright future. Not without challenges, certainly. But I don’t see an impending zombie apocalypse.   Have I got it wrong?  What do you think? Let me know your thoughts and how you think we should tackle the challenge of Climate Change.

 

Graham Wannabe,  2nd October 2019